- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 16:45:02 +1000
- To: Brad Kemper <brkemper@comcast.net>
- CC: Eli Morris-Heft <dai@doublefishstudios.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Brad Kemper wrote: > Here is my mockup: > > http://bradclicks.com/cssplay/Shadows.html Brad, we can do this forever, go here, go there and really make the CSS WG more of an un-working group, we overload them with list messages. Firstly we must see a big difference in 'box-shadow' and 'text-shadow'. Your inner outer proposal is merging three different things. The first two I have just mentioned and the later is 'border'. Using just blur and a border I have emulated your spread (which I have called depth). View in Safari 3. Here with outer. http://css-class.com/test/css/shadows/box-shadow-blur-offset-light.htm And inner. http://css-class.com/test/css/shadows/box-shadow-blur-offset-dark.htm Any spread (depth) could be handled by the 'border' property alone with a gradient unless we really want to add this into 'box-shadow'. The inner and outer way of looking at text-shadow (as in your examples) is great Brad but that should not be confused with box-shadow. Alan
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 06:46:00 UTC