- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:13:11 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
L. David Baron wrote: > On Wednesday 2008-02-27 00:33 -0800, fantasai wrote: >> width logical width >> height logical height > > I like the rest of your proposal, but I think it would be rather > confusing for the height to be a type of width, and the width to be > a type of height. It might be worth continuing to look for usable > terms for these that don't contain height and width. Suggestions welcome; these were the best we could come up with. (I'll note that Howcome's MultiCol module uses "column height" and "column width" pretty successfully.) > (I suppose these are probably better than "block progression dimension" and > "inline progression dimension", though.) Yeah, I really don't want to read the equivalent of CSS2.1 section 10 using those terms. :) "If the specified value of the inline progression dimension is 'auto' then..." ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2008 10:12:52 UTC