- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 01:49:40 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Wednesday 2008-02-27 00:33 -0800, fantasai wrote: > width logical width > height logical height I like the rest of your proposal, but I think it would be rather confusing for the height to be a type of width, and the width to be a type of height. It might be worth continuing to look for usable terms for these that don't contain height and width. (I suppose these are probably better than "block progression dimension" and "inline progression dimension", though.) -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2008 09:49:53 UTC