- From: Andrei Polushin <polushin@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:21:35 +0600
- To: www-style@w3.org
fantasai wrote: > Here's the proposed mapping from current terminology to > writing-mode-generic: > > Dimensions > ---------- > > width logical width > height logical height Good. > Directions > ---------- > > n/a (refer to 'direction' property) inline direction > n/a (refer to 'direction' property) block direction Not so good: while it became a writing-mode-independent, it's still a layout-algorithm-dependent: now it is defined in terms of flow layout. It might be better to use "logical width/height direction", or simply "width/height direction", because the direction of physical width/height always remains constant. > Sides (from LTR reference) > -------------------------- > > top before > left start > right end > bottom after Did you consider "logical-top" etc. instead of "before" etc.? Those before/after/start/end is really inconvenient for authors, and probably for Japanese authors too. I would suggest reusing the terms from both worlds instead of introducing unusual terminology: top logical-top japanese-left left logical-left japanese-bottom right logical-right japanese-top bottom logical-bottom japanese-right In this case, logical-top and japanese-left are full synonyms and can be used interchangeably throughout the specifications. -- Andrei Polushin
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2008 10:22:35 UTC