- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:00:38 +0200
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:50:26 +0200, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> To match existing implementations better and also to give better >> forward compatible parsing rules maybe we should do it as follows: >> * A violation of the basic syntax will cause the list of media queries >> to be ignored. > > I don't agree with this. I think better forward-compatible parsing rules > would be to follow the parse-strings-match-brackets rules used in CSS > declaration blocks and to drop only the affected media query, not the > whole list. So I actually did not include any of those in my examples. If you can suggest how the specification should deal with those that would be appreciated. I don't think that has been covered in any of the older specifications. >> * An unknown media type, media feature, or unknown media feature value >> will cause the respective media query to be ignored, but not the whole >> list of media queries. > > See David Baron's message and my reply > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Apr/0050.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Apr/0053.html Yes, this was an attempt to solve the problem. How does it not? -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 4 April 2008 17:01:21 UTC