- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:37:41 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
L. David Baron wrote: > On Wednesday 2008-04-02 20:28 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: >> In http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-mediaqueries/#syntax there is an >> example that doesn't match the normative text preceding it: >> >> # If one media query in a comma-separated list is ignored, the other >> # media queries in the list are also ignored. >> # >> # Example XV. >> # <link rel="stylesheet" media="screen and (max-weight: 3kg) and >> # (color), (color)" href="example.css" /> >> # >> # In this example, the first media query is rejected due to an unknown >> # media feature and unknown value, but the second media query is >> # evaluated as if the first had not been specified. >> >> The example is unchanged from the last working draft at >> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/#syntax , but the normative >> text has changed to the opposite. If this change was intentional, >> it seems like the example should change as well. > > That said, I'm opposed to this change because it's incompatible not > only with existing implementations of media queries, but because > it's incompatible with existing pre-mediaqueries behavior. The normative text there is also incompatible with our stated resolution from the Boston F2F: http://www.w3.org/blog/CSS/2007/11/14/resolutions_3 ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2008 07:38:52 UTC