- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 00:39:37 +0200
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:00:38 +0200, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:50:26 +0200, fantasai > <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> To match existing implementations better and also to give better >>> forward compatible parsing rules maybe we should do it as follows: >>> * A violation of the basic syntax will cause the list of media >>> queries to be ignored. >> >> I don't agree with this. I think better forward-compatible parsing rules >> would be to follow the parse-strings-match-brackets rules used in CSS >> declaration blocks and to drop only the affected media query, not the >> whole list. > > So I actually did not include any of those in my examples. If you can > suggest how the specification should deal with those that would be > appreciated. I don't think that has been covered in any of the older > specifications. Per further discussion on IRC I have now updated the draft to address this issue. http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-mediaqueries/ Let me know if I have missed anything. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Friday, 4 April 2008 22:40:13 UTC