- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 20:44:52 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Wednesday 2008-04-02 20:28 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: > In http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-mediaqueries/#syntax there is an > example that doesn't match the normative text preceding it: > > # If one media query in a comma-separated list is ignored, the other > # media queries in the list are also ignored. > # > # Example XV. > # <link rel="stylesheet" media="screen and (max-weight: 3kg) and > # (color), (color)" href="example.css" /> > # > # In this example, the first media query is rejected due to an unknown > # media feature and unknown value, but the second media query is > # evaluated as if the first had not been specified. > > The example is unchanged from the last working draft at > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-mediaqueries/#syntax , but the normative > text has changed to the opposite. If this change was intentional, > it seems like the example should change as well. That said, I'm opposed to this change because it's incompatible not only with existing implementations of media queries, but because it's incompatible with existing pre-mediaqueries behavior. The following test: http://dbaron.org/css/test/2008/mq-drop-whole-sequence yields an aqua background in every browser I tested (Firefox trunk, WinIE 7, WebKit trunk, Opera 9.26, Konqueror), whereas the spec change in question seems to mandate that it have a yellow background. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2008 03:45:27 UTC