- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:11:12 +1300
- To: www-style@w3.org
Daniel Beardsmore wrote: > > The point I'm also making, as you may realise, is that a "fluid grid" is > a virtual grid where as many cells fit on a row as will fit, simple as > that. If each cell is 300 px wide, three will fit across a 1024 px wide > screen, but two will fit across an 800 px wide screen. A table with > three columns of 300px each will force the page wider than that 800 px > wide screen (since the table will be at least 900 px wide) but a fluid > grid will just wrap one column early. > > The point is, that in most cases when it comes to galleries, no-one > really cares how many cells fit across the window but tables (and flow: > horizontal) force you to choose an arbitrary figure based on your > ASSUMPTION of a safe screen size. (Even though there is no such thing) I wrote a proposal for a display type that works like this. http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/style/specs/tabs/ I was told that the "flexbox" model would solve the problem, but there hasn't been any progress on that front these past few years.. ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 24 February 2007 07:12:37 UTC