- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:55:51 +0900
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "Asmus Freytag" <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, "'WWW International'" <www-international@w3.org>, unicode@unicode.org
At 19:32 07/02/20, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > >On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:22:23 +0100, fantasai ><fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> Your argument has convinced me that CSS3 Text should be normatively >> requiring the correct implementation of UAX14's normative line breaking >> classes. > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Nov/0020 That mail, as I read it, isn't very helpful. It says is that humans understanding the text can always do better. The problem is that it gives examples where it's not really necessary to use humans to do better; for the urn:it example, the first instance would be written urn: it, and in the second example, the space is already there. So for the examples given, just breaking at a space is all that's needed. Regards, Martin. #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 04:08:25 UTC