- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 00:27:44 +1300
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>, www-style@w3.org, 'WWW International' <www-international@w3.org>, unicode@unicode.org
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:22:23 +0100, fantasai > <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> Your argument has convinced me that CSS3 Text should be normatively >> requiring the correct implementation of UAX14's normative line breaking >> classes. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2005Nov/0020 Yep. But there's no reason the behavior specified in UAX14 for mandatory breaks (CR, LF, NEL, etc) shouldn't be required. For CSS3 Text, the behavior specified for BK, CR, LF, CM, NL classes can, I think, be safely required in all cases. The behavior for WJ, ZW, and GL should be required in normal text wrapping. I don't think we care about SG either way. References to any other parts of UAX14 should be informative only. (The required behavior of SP is imho, not clearly defined. I don't want to import normative text that may or may not contradict the CSS spec itself.) ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 20 February 2007 11:28:11 UTC