- From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 16:56:46 +0000
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, www-style@w3.org
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> I think this is only true if you don't know how CSS works.
Perhaps so, but does that matter ? To my mind,
Elliotte's wording /is/ clearer because it
avoids the obfuscation that results from the
overloading of "triangles".
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-becss-20070205/ :
> @namespace triangles url(http://triangles.example.com/);
> triangles|isoceles { binding: url(triangles.xml#isoceles); }
> triangles|rightangle { binding: url(triangles.xml#rightangle); }
Elliotte :
> @namespace t url(http://namespaces.example.com/);
> t|isoceles { binding: url(triangles.xml#isoceles); }
> t|rightangle { binding: url(triangles.xml#rightangle); }
Punctuation-noise removed :
> @namespace t url(http://namespaces.example.com/);
> t|isoceles {binding: url(triangles.xml#isoceles)}
> t|rightangle {binding: url(triangles.xml#rightangle)}
Philip Taylor
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2007 16:57:55 UTC