- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:42:28 +0900
- To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Le 25 juil. 06 à 03:07, Bert Bos a écrit :
> On Friday 21 July 2006 07:05, karl@w3.org wrote:
>> Hi,
>> This is a QA Review comment for "CSS3 Advanced Layout Module"
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-layout-20051215/
>> 2005-12-15
>> 1st WD
>>
>> About http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-css3-layout-20051215/#position
>>
>> An example is given with a markup proposal which never made it
>> through. We think it would be easier for people to test with
>> something which would be a valid construct in browsers now. It would
>> even encourage good practices for marking up figure if done with a
>> valid markup. Change the example, please.
>
> The example is actually wrong. At least, I think the Generated Content
> module will not allow this. It's there as a reminder that I would like
> to have an example of handling the caption element in XHTML2. However,
> it doesn't use XHTML2, because XHTML2 isn't stable yet.
>
> I will make an example with current HTML and postpone the question of
> how to handle XHTML2.
Yes Good idea! Thanks!
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2006 00:42:48 UTC