- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 10:32:13 -0700
- To: "Brian Sexton" <discussion-w3c@ididnotoptin.com>
- Cc: "www style" <www-style@w3.org>
Hi, Brian, | ... Opera is a notable exception. Try to open http://terrainformatica.com/w3/block-inline.htm then. I wouldn't consider still this as a support of inline-block. (no offence to Opera developers, in fact - my deepest and honest respect to them) BTW: flow: right-to-left/left-to-right solves accessibility problem (what should go first in source: content or sidebar). Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com | > | > So using tables for layout of non-tabular content via HTML is a no-no, | > | > but using "display: table", "display: table-row", and "display: | > | > table-cell" for such content is okay? | > | | > | > The best way would be to use hypothetical "flow" attribute. | > | > . . . | | That sounds pretty swell except for the bit about it being hypothetical. | Somewhat less hypothetically, "display: inline-block" seems like it may be | another good way to accomplish that kind of layout except that most browsers | do not yet seem to support it (or at least, they do not yet support it | well); Opera is a notable exception. | | http://www.w3.org/Talks/2003/0521-CSS-WWW2003/inline-demo.html | | http://www.hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/css/box/inline-block/ | |
Received on Saturday, 2 October 2004 17:33:01 UTC