Re: Useragent Rules in CSS

On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 18:10, Kynn Bartlett wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2004, at 2:45 PM, Brian V Bonini wrote:
> > The whole idea seems to legitimize and condone the broken and
> > non-compliant state most browsers currently find themselves in.
> >
> > I would think the preferable, yet probably less likely resolve, is for
> > the browser manufacturers make a better effort toward recommendation
> > compliancy.
> I'm sorry, you're right.  Obviously designers such as Dave Shea
> should stop using CSS, and should go back to presentational HTML,
> or simply serving up HTML sans styles, until such time as the browser
> manufacturers reach compliancy.
> Thank goodness we have such simple solutions!  I hadn't realized that
> Shea is just some lunatic who doesn't live in the REAL world, where
> we can simply say "oh, it's broken browsers, and that's bad" and
> happily go on our way.
> Go on our way, declare that CSS is completely unusable for
> anything approaching serious design, so we can't do a damn thing with
> it until the browsers get fixed.
> Bravo, Brian!  Great solution.  At least we're not legitimizing
> anything, cuz that would be BAD.

This was necessary? I don't understand the nature of your facetious
reply however if you found something about my original statement
offensive I apologize. Last I checked this was a discussion list and
varying opinions were part of the process. I don't believe I was
disrespectful toward you original post at all. If that's not the case
then by all means please indicate how so.

In the 'REAL world' there are *solutions* for UA specific rules. I was
just questioning if acknowledging the broken state of most browsers in
this manner was ethically the correct approach. Mostly to simply offer
some contrast to the original post. You'll notice I said, "would think
the preferable, yet probably less likely resolve", which pretty clearly
indicates I actually believe your suggestion IS necessary and the
probability of 100% browser compliancy is quite low.

In any case, I'm not sure what has driven you toward such a heinous

Brian        GnuPG -> KeyID: 0x04A4F0DC | Key Server:
gpg --keyserver --recv-keys 04A4F0DC
Key Info:
Linux Registered User #339825 at

Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2004 10:16:48 UTC