- From: Brian V Bonini <b-bonini@cox.net>
- Date: 31 Mar 2004 10:27:55 -0500
- To: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 18:05, David Hyatt wrote: > Speaking for Safari, we are making that effort, but as anyone who has > worked on a browser can tell you, achieving bug-free CSS2, DOM2, HTML4, > XHTML1 compliance is a multi-year task. It's unrealistic to expect > browser vendors to achieve this sort of perfection overnight, and it's > equally unreasonable to expect browser vendors to withhold releases > while waiting for a state of perfection that may take years to reach. > I agree, but in a perfect world... I just wonder if such an action would lower the priority of compliancy with browser manufacturers or worse yet mask the areas that are *broken*. But perhaps the state of 100% compliancy is a fantasy and the reality is that it IS indeed time for an *official* solution. > On Mar 30, 2004, at 2:45 PM, Brian V Bonini wrote: > > > I would think the preferable, yet probably less likely resolve, is for > > the browser manufacturers make a better effort toward recommendation > > compliancy. > > > > > > -- > > Brian GnuPG -> KeyID: 0x04A4F0DC | Key Server: pgp.mit.edu > > ====================================================================== > > gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 04A4F0DC > > Key Info: http://gfx-design.com/keys > > Linux Registered User #339825 at http://counter.li.org > > -- Brian GnuPG -> KeyID: 0x04A4F0DC | Key Server: pgp.mit.edu ====================================================================== gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 04A4F0DC Key Info: http://gfx-design.com/keys Linux Registered User #339825 at http://counter.li.org
Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2004 10:31:45 UTC