- From: Stanimir Stamenkov <stanio@myrealbox.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 19:35:29 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
Robert Koberg wrote:
> You would be surprised how much it simplifies things. Separation of
> Concerns is a good thing.
O.k. We are talking about improving the CSS language.
Workarounds/practices defined for/of shortcomings are not eternal
solution, IMHO.
> In the example I provided (to address this concern) which you seem to
> have ignored, I used the element name as the class name. Therefore you
> handle the final styling with CSS.
BTW, your example is not very good for my case. In the abstract XML
a need to have:
<HDR1/>
<PARA/>
<HDR2/>
<PARA/>
<HDR3/>
<PARA/>
<HDR2/>
<PARA/>
<PARA/>
and in the HTML output:
<BODY>
<H1/>
<P/>
<DIV class="generated-section">
<H2/>
<P/>
<DIV class="generated-section">
<H3/>
<P/>
</DIV>
</DIV>
<DIV class="generated-section">
<H2/>
<P/>
<P/>
</DIV>
</BODY>
So I want to display my source XML document using CSS without
transforming it into another and applying different CSS.
--
Stanimir
Received on Thursday, 30 October 2003 12:35:33 UTC