- From: Maximilian Baumgart <max.baumgart@web.de>
- Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 19:06:47 +0200
- To: Tim Bagot <tsb-w3-style-0007@earth.li>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Tim Bagot <tsb-w3-style-0007@earth.li> wrote on Sun, 12 Oct 2003 13:45:48 +0000 (UTC): > It's not a convention I'm especially fond of, but if you do want it, the > problem with doing it that way is that you can only ever specify it for a > finite (though arbitrarily high) level of nesting, and the number of > selectors required grows exponentially. Yes, the number of required selectors would grow, but where you have a nesting with moore than 3 or 4 levels? The code would imho still be easy to crasp. -- Maximilian. --- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
Received on Sunday, 12 October 2003 13:10:56 UTC