- From: J. David Eisenberg <catcode@catcode.com>
- Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 13:32:00 -0600 (CST)
- To: Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com>
- cc: www-style@w3.org
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Shelby Moore wrote: > > This is important enough to deserve a new thread. > > > ===== > 1. Implementation specifications which conform to markup specifications are > conforming and are thus presentation. Most of CSS is. Any portions of > implementation specifications will which allow non-conformance to markup > specifications are "non-conforming semantic layer".[1] > ====== > > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Jan/0110.html > > > Can every one agree this is one useful way of defining "presentation"?? Sorry, but I must be exceptionally ignorant (or worse, stupid)--I don't understand this definition at all. A succinct, concrete example would help me get it through my thick, concrete skull. And no, I have not read the other thread in its entirety, in depth. (I'm sure the examples are somewhere in there.) -- J. David Eisenberg http://catcode.com/
Received on Sunday, 5 January 2003 14:34:47 UTC