- From: Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com>
- Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 17:24:50 -0600
- To: "J. David Eisenberg" <catcode@catcode.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
At 01:32 PM 1/5/2003 -0600, J. David Eisenberg wrote: >> Can every one agree this is one useful way of defining "presentation"?? > >Sorry, but I must be exceptionally ignorant (or worse, stupid)--I don't >understand this definition at all. No need to say that. Questions from people who want to learn are the best questions to ask. I expected the definition would need some examples, because it is a very abstract and powerful one. > A succinct, concrete example would >help me get it through my thick, concrete skull. I just gave 3 examples. 2 show what is "presentation" and 1 shows "non-conforming semantic implementation": http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Jan/0124.html See "p:empty": http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Jan/0123.html -Shelby Moore
Received on Sunday, 5 January 2003 18:23:48 UTC