- From: Shelby Moore <shelby@coolpage.com>
- Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 12:35:46 -0600
- To: www-style@w3.org
- Cc: John Lewis <lewi0371@mrs.umn.edu>, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Essentially I have now formulated two rules by which to do correct W3C specification. 1. Implementation specifications which conform to markup specifications are conforming and are thus presentation. Most of CSS is. Any portions of implementation specifications will which allow non-conformance to markup specifications are "non-conforming semantic layer". 2. Isolate the "non-conforming semantic layer" portions from implementation specifications, such that they can be separated from conforming portions. This is was the ENTIRE point of my "CSS is wrong W3C layer for semantic" portion of my thread. See the following 2 posts for final answer: [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Jan/0104.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Jan/0102.html -Shelby Moore
Received on Sunday, 5 January 2003 13:34:47 UTC