- From: Chris Basken <chriz@basken.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:07:35 -0500
- To: <www-style@w3.org>
> As a developer myself, if I want to make sure I write good HTML, I use a > validator or HTML Tidy ... these are tools designed to be used to check > code. I don't think a browser should be that tool. It will make the > browser more bloated than it already is - and a browser isn't a > debugger. but wouldn't that make the browser *less* bloated? after all, it's simpler to write code that looks for a specific result and returns an exception if it doesn't find it, than it is to write code that looks for a specific result and then runs through a list of assumtions about what the author intended, and then -- only if none of those assumptions seems to work -- throw an exception. not to mention faster and more consistent. p.s. i'm not really following this whole thread, but i caught this and wanted to comment on it.
Received on Wednesday, 28 February 2001 11:10:57 UTC