- From: Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@appcomp.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 07:21:51 -0600
- To: www-style@w3.org
>01 feb 2001, www-style, jyasskin@hotmail.com >why a new Selectors version and not XPath which is a REC ? In chronological order, Selectors were a REC >long time before the birth of XPath. It is just an improvement. Furthermore, other specs than CSS want to >use the CSS selecting mechanism and not XPath. That's not quite what I suggested. W3C Selectors are great for the current version of CSS. I was asking if it is reasonable to migrate to XPath in future versions of CSS. Jeffrey Yasskin, MCSD -----Original Message----- From: glazman@netscape.com [mailto:glazman@netscape.com] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 6:08 AM To: www-style@w3.org Subject: Answers to comments on W3C Selectors Last Call WD The attached document contains all the comments related to W3C Selectors Last Call WD and the corresponding answers. Thanks _a lot_ to all reviewers, your help is priceless. Note: François Yergeau sent me a mail with a long list of specific comments about the french version of the document. Mostly typos and translation problems. All integrated in that version. </Daniel>
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2001 08:25:24 UTC