- From: Clover Andrew <aclover@1VALUE.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 15:52:17 +0200
- To: "'www-style@w3.org'" <www-style@w3.org>
This seems quite an obvious issue to me, I was surprised not to be able to find an answer in the spec or list archives. What should happen when the name of a generic font family matches the name of an actual font the user has installed? I've come across tediously-named fonts like "Serif" before, for sure. And IE5 for one will use the specific font over the generic; of course there's no guarantee the specific font will be a good match at all. Should generic names, then, have predence? (According to one IE5.5 user, a site I maintain turned up all in a symbol font for him; I had simply applied font-family: serif to the main text and had rather hoped this would be at least readable for everyone. The problem went away when I specified a more specific font before the generic one. I thought this could be caused by the issue above, although he swears he doesn't have a symbol font installed under the name 'serif'! Can anyone think of any other explanation?) -- Andrew Clover Technical Support 1VALUE.com AG
Received on Friday, 8 September 2000 09:57:36 UTC