- From: Daniel Glazman <glazou_2000@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 18:27:16 +0200
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Matthew Brealey wrote: > Precisely one argument - one simple selector. Cause !:first-child is > not as nicely wrapped up as :!(:first-child). I did consider :not(), > but I preferred the briefer syntax. Sorry, but I do not support (I mean not *at all*) this courageous attempt to add smileys :!( to W3C selectors. </Daniel> _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2000 12:27:48 UTC