Re: selector negation (was Re: New version of the Selectors module of CSS3)

You wrote:
> 
> Matthew Brealey wrote:
> 
> 
> > I did propose ! before, but maybe :!() is better.
> 
> Did I understand correctly ? Are you really proposing the following
> sequence : colon-bang-parenthesis-parenthesis ???

Yuh.
 
> Just for fun, let me ask a complementary question : is there any
> argument between the parenthesis ?-)

Yuh.

Precisely one argument - one simple selector. Cause !:first-child is
not as nicely wrapped up as :!(:first-child). I did consider :not(),
but I preferred the briefer syntax.

Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2000 11:31:13 UTC