- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:58:40 -0400
- To: www-style@w3.org
At 06:27 PM 10/10/00 +0200, Daniel Glazman wrote: >Matthew Brealey wrote: > >> Precisely one argument - one simple selector. Cause !:first-child is >> not as nicely wrapped up as :!(:first-child). I did consider :not(), >> but I preferred the briefer syntax. > >Sorry, but I do not support (I mean not *at all*) this courageous >attempt to add smileys :!( to W3C selectors. Oh, come on, Daniel! It might be nice to have something cheery in a W3C spec for once. After all these years of poring over dry text, a smile finally emerges... Okay, I'm kidding too. Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. XHTML: Migrating Toward XML http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2000 12:55:14 UTC