- From: Jonny Axelsson <jonny@metastasis.net>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 15:24:28 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
This letter should pref- | At 00:56 15.01.00 -0800 erably not be read with | Erik van der Poel wrote: proportional fonts. | | A NOTE ON HALFLEADING | 2. HALFLEADING | This column uses default | The spec should clearly CSS values, same padding, | state that the half-leading margin around a block and | is added to the top and the same amount of lead- | bottom of the font-size. ing above and below the | (I would like to remove line. Typographically a | the term "when set solid" ratio of 8:5:3 has been | from the spec, since it's used, with the whitespace | not appropriate in the digi- above a block higher than | tal font world. Similarly, the space below (right). | leading and half-leading | are not very appropriate. CASE: PAGEMAKER | Since the terms padding and | margin are already used for Pagemaker uses the simple | other purposes, how about rule that set 2/3 of the | calling it line spacing or leading above the line | font spacing? Or vertical and 1/3 below. This rule | spacing, to avoid confusion works reasonably well | with letter-spacing.) with Western typography, +----------------------------- I don't know how relevant it is to other scripts. I guess this has been discussed before, and there is no major harm done. How the leading is calculated is only relevant when calculating borders or when two different blocks meet, as with the subheads simulated above. It can be compensating by adding padding-top and negative padding-bottom, but calculating the right values makes writing style sheets needlessly complex. We'll probably be stuck with a "Netscape layout" with every heading an appendix to the previous paragraph for a long time to come. Jonny Axelsson, Net asset Metastasis design, Norway
Received on Sunday, 16 January 2000 09:24:19 UTC