- From: Ian Hickson <py8ieh@bath.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 21:12:11 +0000 (BST)
- To: Ignacio Javier <ignacio.gomez@dicoruna.es>
- cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@fas.harvard.edu>, www-style@w3.org
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, Ignacio Javier wrote (in a rather surreal moment): > <h1> > <p> > I'm not a paragraph that involves easily with bad guys. In fact I > love one paragraph ...his name is .... is..I love a not selectable > paragraph? > </p> > </h1> (I assume this is not HTML. If this is HTML, then the above is invalid.) That paragraph can be selected with the following selector: h1 p ...or h1 > p ...or p:first-child > <p> > I'm cool, I'm a good guy, but someone is using my personality!??? I > fact I'm the paragraph loved by the one above, his name is h1 > p .... > </p> That would be h1 + p, I think. > <h1> > </h1> > <p> > I'm a very bad guy, but fortunatelly people confuses me with the > paragraph above, ha ha!!! > </p> The first one can be selected by h1:first-child + p ...or, if we use my suggestion from a few months back of a pseudo-class selector :contains, h1:contains(P) + P The paragraph after the second h1 can be selected by h1 + p + h1 + p or just * + h1 + p > Will the president of CSS country have to give an identifier to > citizen Cool? Depending on the situation, that may actually be the better solution. After all, why do you want to select the _second_ p-after-h1? Is it actually the first-p-after-an-h1-following-any-number-of-ps-following-an- h1? Or is it a paragraph containing a particular piece of data? -- Ian Hickson U+2642 U+2651 U+262E U+2603 U+263A
Received on Sunday, 14 March 1999 16:12:20 UTC