- From: Ignacio Javier <ignacio.gomez@dicoruna.es>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 00:42:58 +0100
- To: Ian Hickson <py8ieh=www-style@bath.ac.uk>, www-style@w3.org
<spam style="display:inline"> The last mail I wrote was surrealistic?.... I closed a list recently, it was 00000001@onelist.com.... That was surreal.... </spam> Ian Hickson escribió: > On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, Ignacio Javier wrote (in a rather surreal moment): > > > <h1> > > <p> > > I'm not a paragraph that involves easily with bad guys. In fact I > > love one paragraph ...his name is .... is..I love a not selectable > > paragraph? > > </p> > > </h1> > > (I assume this is not HTML. If this is HTML, then the above is invalid.) > > That paragraph can be selected with the following selector: > > h1 p > > ...or > > h1 > p > > ...or > p:first-child ok > > > <p> > > I'm cool, I'm a good guy, but someone is using my personality!??? I > > fact I'm the paragraph loved by the one above, his name is h1 > p .... > > </p> > > That would be h1 + p, I think. > I would get the last Bad P too > > > <h1> > > </h1> > > <p> > > I'm a very bad guy, but fortunatelly people confuses me with the > > paragraph above, ha ha!!! > > </p> > > The first one can be selected by > > h1:first-child + p > suppose you mean p:first-child + p but... > > ...or, if we use my suggestion from a few months back of a pseudo-class > selector :contains, > > h1:contains(P) + P > I need to clarify the following: (excuses if I use bad terminology): If you want a selector sintax to be capable of complex selecions it might be able to select in base to structures. I mean, if you have a document in a stable way (loaded) then you can have all info about structure on it, and ¿why not refer to selectors by tree?: Example: (h1 > p) + p h1>p will refer to p that..... h1:contains(p) will refer to h1 that.... but more generic (...) denote tree structure and so: (h1 > p) + p denotes a p that has sibling relation with an h1 that has a p child in structure p < h1 will denote as selected an h1 that has a p as child but: (p < h1) would be equal to (h1 > p) More: you can use: ((p+(p em))<h1 to denote selecting h1 in a structure that has as childs 2 contiguous <p> and a <em> as descendant of the second I love to see all that implemented in Microsoft , Netscape and Opera. Let's follow standards. And today is my birthday . (Some of what I said is a lie, some is probably impossible and some is an utopy. And I do not really matter some of what I said....)
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 1999 18:45:23 UTC