- From: Rasmus Kaj <rasmus@kaj.a.se>
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 10:14:07 -0500 (EST)
- To: py8ieh=www-style@bath.ac.uk, py8ieh@bath.ac.uk
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, rasmus@kaj.a.se, davidp@earthlink.net, sjoerd@heeten.nl
- Cc: kaj@interbizz.se
>>>>> "IH" == Ian Hickson <py8ieh@bath.ac.uk> writes: IH> A while back, Rasmus Kaj and I suggested an idea for stretching IH> backgrounds, based on item 24 in the list of suggested changes to CSS IH> written by the WG. IH> Sjoerd Visscher then privately suggested to me that instead of using IH> "fit-x" and "fit-y", one could instead simply state the size of the IH> background image. At the time I considered that the added complexity IH> would not be worth the added functionality involved, but after IH> thinking about it for a while, I have changed my mind. I agree that Sjoerd's suggestion (which I won't quote) seems to be better than our previous suggestion. -- Rasmus Kaj ---------------- rasmus@kaj.a.se - http://www.e.kth.se/~kaj/ \ I link, therefore I am - /usr/bin/ld \--------------------------------------------- http://www.Raditex.se/
Received on Monday, 22 February 1999 11:00:44 UTC