- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 16:48:26 +0100
- To: "Eric A. Meyer" <emeyer@sr71.lit.cwru.edu>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
"Eric A. Meyer" wrote:
>
> Chris LIlley wrote:
>
> >Well stop messing around with GIF and with bulk-enhancing dithering
> >screens and start using PNG, which does not mandate large type and comes
> >in 0/255, 1/255, 2/255 .... 255/255 varieties.
>
> Show me that browsers natively, efficiently support PNG and content
> negotiation, and I for one would switch in a second. I'm sick of being
> stuck with 1-bit transparency channels.
>
> </EMeyer>
>
> --
> Eric A. Meyer - eam3@po.cwru.edu - http://www.cwru.edu/home/eam3.html
> Editor, Style Sheets Reference Guide http://style.webreview.com/
> Coordinator, CSS1 Test Suite http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/
> Member, WSP CSS Technical Committee http://www.webstandards.org/
Testing with the browsers I have handy access to (at home, so I don't
have that many)
Mozilla/4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, image/png, */*
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0b1; Windows NT)
image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, image/pjpeg,
application/vnd.ms-excel, application/msword, */*
amaya/V1.3a libwww/5.1n
*/*
Mozilla/3.0 (compatible; Opera/3.0; Windows NT 4.0) 3.50b9
image/gif, image/x-xbitmap, image/jpeg, */*
Received on Monday, 8 February 1999 10:45:05 UTC