Re: Comments URI Proposal from gordon on 1998-02-17 (www-style@w3.org from February 1998)

From: gordon <gordon69b@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 22:00:19 -0800
To: <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001e01bd3b69$56f8e940$e55efcd0@epidote>

..
>I liked your more formal colophon idea. It may as you say belong
>in HTML where the information can travel with the document, and
>thus not be turned off as CSS might be. I don't see room for it
>readily in ADDRESS, or in LINK REV=made, but maybe in META, for
>example, NAME="colophon".
>


Since LONGDESC is one of the new attributes of HTML 4.0, why not petition
for it to apply to both STYLE and LINK?  It can travel with the document,
and it's meant to hold a URI.

just a thought,
gordon [no 'q' in earthlink to reply]

Received on Tuesday, 17 February 1998 01:00:47 UTC