- From: Bjorn E. Backlund <bjorn@cooper.xanthus.se>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 08:04:37 -0100
- To: "'Todd Fahrnlund'" <fahrner@pobox.com>
- Cc: "'www-style@w3.org'" <www-style@w3.org>
Hi, Re: What are the chances you'll be reworking your code to match the emerging standard. The whole idea with the project is to promote standard file formats so the answer to you question is yes... Best, Bjorn ---------- From: Todd Fahrnlund Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 1997 7:53 PM To: Carl Johan Berglund; Bjorn E. Backlund Cc: www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: New HTML/CSS-based word processor for Windows 95 and NT. LOOKING FOR BETA TESTERS Carl Johan Berglund wrote, at 16:30 +0100 on 17.9.97: > Wouldn't you like to put together a document describing your > proposed extensions to CSS, so that all of us not using Windows > can discuss them? I would also like to know how much of CSS > you have implemented. CSS1? CSS positioning? Printing exten- > sions? I agree that this is a very interesting product, and would also be interested in testing a Mac OS version. One obvious direction for exploration, I think, would be to make the native format an HTML-based kind of XML, and have HTML as an output format, with classed DIVs and SPANs taking over for non-HTML elements. Extensions to CSS are, perhaps, inevitable to some degree. Where it gets especially objectionable is when ad-hoc extensions are redundant (and incompatible) with planned ones. It sounds like some of your printing extensions are home-grown versions of the W3C working draft. What are the chances you'll be reworking your code to match the emerging standard? __________________ Todd Fahrner mailto:fahrner@pobox.com http://www.verso.com/
Received on Thursday, 18 September 1997 05:00:53 UTC