- From: Brother Baker <applemac@frank.mtsu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1995 10:19:35 -0500 (CDT)
- To: www-style@www10.w3.org
Hakon, I just wanted to know... are we still saying that the notation should go from more general to more specific? Because, if so then, I think that the examples noted >, should be more like those noted as >>. [...] > P: big.font.size = 30pt // or better, a relative size >> P: font.size.big = 30pt > P: alternate.font.style = uppercase >> P: font.style.alt (-ernate) = uppercase > P: big.font.size = 30pt; alternate.font.spacing = 140% >> P: font.size.big = 30pt; font.spacing.alt = 140% Or did I miss some point in the discussion that changed this? I have seen you and others use these types of misordered (or not?) notation, and so I was just wondering. Thanks. --James Baker / http://www.mtsu.edu/~applemac MTCSC Home / http://www.mtsu.edu/~mtcsc
Received on Tuesday, 11 July 1995 11:22:05 UTC