- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 15:19:02 +0300
- To: <eric@w3.org>, <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
I have revised [1] the CBD document [2] to (attempt to) address comments recieved both in conjunction with the W3C submission process as well as in recent discussions on rdf-interest. Please give special attention to the note on terminology [3] provided at the end of this revised draft. Note that this revision reinstates the original definition of "concise bounded description", as used and deployed by URIQA and the Nokia Semantic Web server, and identifies a distict form of description "inverse functional concise bounded description" as one way to address the particular needs of certain applications. Please also note the implications of choosing one form of description over another on minimal query interface requirements. Constructive, friendly comments on this revised document offered in goodwill for the benefit of all concerned, and taking fully into account the context and manner in which the document is presented [3], are most welcome. Regards, Patrick [1] http://swdev.nokia.com/uriqa/CBD.html [2] http://www.w3.org/Submission/CBD/ [3] http://swdev.nokia.com/uriqa/CBD.html#r1
Received on Tuesday, 5 October 2004 12:19:53 UTC