- From: Rhoads, Stephen <SRhoads@ThruPoint.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:53:26 -0500
- To: "'www-rdf-interest@w3.org'" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <B24F5C4EDA48D511B6CB00508BDFC194BB85AC@nyexchclstr.thrupoint.net>
How about an ontology for describing schemas themselves? Then set your spider loose on the web and bada boom ... a complete list with descriptions, links and everything. -----Original Message----- From: Pete Johnston To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org Sent: 1/13/04 10:44 AM Subject: RE: Listing vocabularies RE: Some questions Charles said: > I suspect you haven't a hope of ever getting all the schemas. > One interesting approach would be to collect RDF content and > collect up all the terms used, seeing if they are defined > anywhere (like a traditional search engine does). Note: The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. ThruPoint, Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 13 January 2004 10:54:07 UTC