- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:13:08 -0500
- To: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@cdepot.net>
- CC: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, David Menendez <zednenem@psualum.com>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Richard H. McCullough wrote:
> I don't think intension vs. extension is the issue here; the whole point
> is that the rdfs:subClassOf property does not rule out the alternative
> that the two Classes are identical, i.e., subsume the same group of
> individuals.
>
> In reality, intension and extension are inseparable.
They may be inseparable, but they're different. And you've addressed
the first sentence of my reply:
>
> My impression is that the basic problem here is trying to consider
> subclass as specifying an intensional rather than an extensional
> relationship.
but not the rest:
> In RDFS, a class is a resource that represents the
> set of
> things which have that class as the value of their rdf:type property.
> Given that definition, it certainly could be true that at any given
> point, the class Man (i.e., the set of things that have class Man as
> the
> value of their rdf:type property) could be the same as (have the same
> members as) the class Animal (the set of things that have class Animal
> as the value of their rdf:type property). However, there is no
> specification that the two classes are (or could be) intensionally
> identical. All the Semantics spec (entailment rdfs9) says is that
>
> Man rdfs:subClassOf Animal
> aaa rdf:type Man
>
> entails
>
> aaa rdf:type Animal
>
> It does NOT say that
>
> Man rdfs:subClassOf Animal
> aaa rdf:type Animal
>
> entails
>
> aaa rdf:type Man
>
> Could you cast what you see as the problem is these terms?
>
To amplify on this a bit, it seems to me that when you say that the
rdfs:subClassOf property does not rule out the alternative that the two
Classes are identical, you're effectively saying that it does not rule
out the entailment, in the above example, that:
Man rdfs:subClassOf Animal
aaa rdf:type Animal
entails
aaa rdf:type Man
But RDF does not license that entailment.
--Frank
--
Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation
202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420
mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-875
Received on Friday, 22 November 2002 09:56:14 UTC