- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:13:08 -0500
- To: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@cdepot.net>
- CC: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, David Menendez <zednenem@psualum.com>, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Richard H. McCullough wrote: > I don't think intension vs. extension is the issue here; the whole point > is that the rdfs:subClassOf property does not rule out the alternative > that the two Classes are identical, i.e., subsume the same group of > individuals. > > In reality, intension and extension are inseparable. They may be inseparable, but they're different. And you've addressed the first sentence of my reply: > > My impression is that the basic problem here is trying to consider > subclass as specifying an intensional rather than an extensional > relationship. but not the rest: > In RDFS, a class is a resource that represents the > set of > things which have that class as the value of their rdf:type property. > Given that definition, it certainly could be true that at any given > point, the class Man (i.e., the set of things that have class Man as > the > value of their rdf:type property) could be the same as (have the same > members as) the class Animal (the set of things that have class Animal > as the value of their rdf:type property). However, there is no > specification that the two classes are (or could be) intensionally > identical. All the Semantics spec (entailment rdfs9) says is that > > Man rdfs:subClassOf Animal > aaa rdf:type Man > > entails > > aaa rdf:type Animal > > It does NOT say that > > Man rdfs:subClassOf Animal > aaa rdf:type Animal > > entails > > aaa rdf:type Man > > Could you cast what you see as the problem is these terms? > To amplify on this a bit, it seems to me that when you say that the rdfs:subClassOf property does not rule out the alternative that the two Classes are identical, you're effectively saying that it does not rule out the entailment, in the above example, that: Man rdfs:subClassOf Animal aaa rdf:type Animal entails aaa rdf:type Man But RDF does not license that entailment. --Frank -- Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-875
Received on Friday, 22 November 2002 09:56:14 UTC