- From: David Menendez <zednenem@psualum.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 00:19:15 -0500
- To: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@cdepot.net>
- Cc: "RDF-Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2002 00:17:52 UTC
At 7:45 PM -0800 2002-11-20, Richard H. McCullough wrote: >I am still baffled by your RDF-MT equations. >Are you saying that > rdfs:Property is an individual of rdfs:Class >instead of > rdfs:Property is a subclass of rdfs:Class > Yes. rdf:Property is a resource. Its type is rdfs:Class. A point of clarification: I am neither the author of RDF-MT nor a member of the working group. I'm just applying the forms given in the document and my own understanding. >I'd like to stick to identifying the nature of rdfs:Property & rdfs:Class, >since I know that they are concepts, and I know what concepts are. >I do not know what your RDF-MT symbols are. A property is represented by a resource with the type rdf:Property. It can be used as the predicate in an RDF assertion. A class is represented by a resource with the type rdfs:Class. It can be used as the value of rdf:type. PS. It's rdf:Property, not rdfs:Property. -- Dave Menendez - zednenem@psualum.com - http://www.eyrie.org/~zednenem/
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2002 00:17:52 UTC