- From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 19:42:38 +0100
- To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "Jon Hanna" <jon@spin.ie>, "RDF-Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
>My personally preferred approach tends to be using linked >metadata, and even >metadata that isn't explicitly linked. This is because I would >prefer to make >metadata for information where I am not the author or someone with write >access anyway. > >Equally, I want access to metadata provided by people other than >the original >authors. Agreed 100%. I don't think anyone was suggesting that these lighter approaches should in any way detract from the ability to make that kind of statements. As I see it there is a need for something supplementary for embedding inside documents that is very simple but more semweb-friendly than existing HTML <meta>. In practice it would be good to be able to do this in a 'View Source', copy, paste & modify way, nice and easy. The modifying shouldn't need any great thought, ideally. A political bonus would be that people that peep through the RDF keyhole wouldn't be scared off by RDF/XML.
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2002 13:53:57 UTC