- From: David Menendez <zednenem@psualum.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 01:41:27 -0500
- To: "RDF-Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
At 11:48 AM +0000 2002-11-18, Jon Hanna wrote: > > The recommendation of WG to eschew embedding in XHTML and link in the RDF >> instead > >To what extent is that long-term advice, and to what extent merely a method >that allows you to deal with there not currently being any way to put RDF in >an XHTML document and remain valid XHTML? On that note, is there any thought of using RDF/XML for metadata in future versions of HTML? For example, something like: <html xmlns="..."> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="..."> <rdf:Description about=""> <title>Page title</title> </rdf:Description> ... </rdf:RDF> <body> ... </body> </html> For XML-only implementations, you would require that the description of the page itself be the first child of /html/rdf:RDF and contain the html:title property. The script element could be replaced in a similar fashion. It isn't backward compatible, but neither is XHTML 2. Even so, older browsers that just look for a "title" element can still interpret at least that much correctly. -- Dave Menendez - zednenem@psualum.com - http://www.eyrie.org/~zednenem/
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2002 18:24:52 UTC