- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 21:15:04 +0000
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
This is fine for me. (I think my original comment has been rather overtaken by developments.) #g -- At 02:50 PM 3/11/02 +0000, Brian McBride wrote: >, >In > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Sep/0032.html > >you raised an issue which was captured in > > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-identity-of-statements > >as > >[[[ >There is a question whether or not there can be two different statements >with the same subject, object and property. Most people seem to say "no". >I have suggested that this should be allowed because it can be expressed >in reified RDF statements and that there should be a 1:1 correspondence >between what can be expressed in an RDF model and its reification. >]]] > >As recorded in > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0476.html > >the RDFCore WG has resolved: > > <stmt1> <rdf:type> <rdf:Statement> . > <stmt1> <rdf:subject> <subject> . > <stmt1> <rdf:predicate> <predicate> . > <stmt1> <rdf:object> <object> . > > <stmt2> <rdf:type> <rdf:Statement> . > <stmt2> <rdf:subject> <subject> . > <stmt2> <rdf:predicate> <predicate> . > <stmt2> <rdf:object> <object> . > > <stmt1> <property> <foo> . > > does not entail: > > <stmt2> <property> <foo> . > >This is a formal way of saying that two reified statements with the same >subject, predicate and object can be different resources. > >Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org >indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue. > >Brian McBride >RDFCore co-chair ------------ Graham Klyne GK@NineByNine.org
Received on Monday, 11 March 2002 16:21:40 UTC