RE: RDF Issue rdfms-rdf-names-use

That's fine.
Thanks
Brian.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian McBride [mailto:bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
> Sent: 11 March 2002 13:09
> To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
> Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
> Subject: RDF Issue rdfms-rdf-names-use
>
>
> Jeremy,
>
> In
>
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2001Jul/0041.html
>
> you raised an issue which was captured in
>
>    http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-rdf-names-use
>
> as
>
> [[[
> Clarify the legality of the use of names from the RDF namespace, e.g. can
> rdf:Bag be used as a property or can rdf:Description be used as a
> property
> attribute etc.
> ]]]
>
> In addition to previous WG decisions as noted in:
>
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001OctDec/0388.html
>
> as recorded in:
>
>    http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020225-f2f/#d-2002-02-25-3
>
> the WG has further decided:
>
> [[
> that an RDF processor SHOULD emit a warning when encountering
> names in the
> RDF namespace which are not defined, but should otherwise behave normally.
>
> Specifically:
>
>    <rdf:Description>
>      <rdf:foo>foo</rdf:foo>
>    </rdf:Description>
>
> is equivalent to:
>
> _:a <rdf:foo> "foo" .
>
> and the issue is closed.
> ]]
>
> Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org
> indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue.
>
> Brian McBride
> RDFCore co-chair
>
>

Received on Monday, 11 March 2002 09:10:27 UTC