- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:13:31 +0000
- To: timbl@w3.org
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Tim,
In
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Feb/0172.html
you raised an issue which was captured in
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-fragments
as
[[[
"In the RDF (model/syntax) spec a reference to a subtree of an XML
document containing RDF is taken to be a reference to the RDF object." (TimBL)
]]]
As recorded in
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020225-f2f/
the RDFCore WG has resolved:
[[
that RDF uses URI's with fragment ID's to identify resources. This issue is
now closed.
]]
The WG also raised an action to draft text for the primer on the use of
fragment id's with appropriate warnings regarding their semantics and asked
Dan Connolly to hightlight this issue with the TAG.
Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org
indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue.
Brian McBride
RDFCore co-chair
Received on Monday, 11 March 2002 09:15:54 UTC