- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 18:48:11 +0000
- To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Jeremy,
In
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2001Jul/0041.html
you raised an issue which was captured in
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-rdf-names-use
as
[[[
Clarify the legality of the use of names from the RDF namespace, e.g. can
rdf:Bag be used as a property or can rdf:Description be used as a property
attribute etc.
]]]
As recorded in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0651.html
the RDFCore WG:
o Resolves that the use of rdf:RDF, rdf:ID, rdf:about,
rdf:resource, rdf:bagID, rdf:parseType, rdf:aboutEach and rdf:li
except as reserved names as specified in the grammar is an error.
o resolves that test case
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test005.rdf
be obsoleted
o resolves that a copy of that test case be created as an error
test case
Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org
indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue.
Brian McBrideRDFCore co-chair
Received on Thursday, 20 December 2001 13:48:45 UTC