Re: p3p rdf schema

Hi Marc,

At 15:25 04/02/2002 +0000, wrote:

>   With the proposal of multiple ranges and multiple domains (disjuntion
>interpretation) you can say.
><rdf:Property rdf:about="&p3p;disputeResolution">
>   <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">dispute resolution</rdfs:label>
>   <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">
>     A collection of dispute resolution procedures that may be
>     followed for disputes about a service&apos;s privacy practices.
>   </rdfs:comment>
>   <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&p3p;Policy"/>
>   <rdfs:range
>   <rdfs:range  rdf:resource="&p3p;DisputeResolution-court"/>
>   <rdfs:range  rdf:resource="&p3p;DisputeResolution-applicable-law"/>
>   <rdfs:range  rdf:resource="&p3p;DisputeResolution-customer-service"/>
>   And you have exactly what you wanted.

And if, given your approach, I wrote:

     <p3p:disputeResolution rdf:resource="&bwm;Gotcha"/>

   <rdf:Property rdf:about="&p3p;disputeResolution">
     <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&bwm;Gotcha"/>


Received on Monday, 4 February 2002 10:35:09 UTC