- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 15:33:11 +0000
- To: tarod@softhome.net
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Hi Marc,
At 15:25 04/02/2002 +0000, tarod@softhome.net wrote:
> With the proposal of multiple ranges and multiple domains (disjuntion
>interpretation) you can say.
>
><rdf:Property rdf:about="&p3p;disputeResolution">
> <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">dispute resolution</rdfs:label>
> <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">
> A collection of dispute resolution procedures that may be
> followed for disputes about a service's privacy practices.
> </rdfs:comment>
> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&p3p;Policy"/>
> <rdfs:range
>rdf:resource="&p3p;DisputeResolution-independent-organization"/>
> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&p3p;DisputeResolution-court"/>
> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&p3p;DisputeResolution-applicable-law"/>
> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&p3p;DisputeResolution-customer-service"/>
></rdf:Property>
>
> And you have exactly what you wanted.
And if, given your approach, I wrote:
<p3p:Policy>
<p3p:disputeResolution rdf:resource="&bwm;Gotcha"/>
</p2p:Policy>
<rdf:Property rdf:about="&p3p;disputeResolution">
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="&bwm;Gotcha"/>
</rdf:Property>
Brian
Received on Monday, 4 February 2002 10:35:09 UTC