- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 15:33:11 +0000
- To: tarod@softhome.net
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Hi Marc, At 15:25 04/02/2002 +0000, tarod@softhome.net wrote: > With the proposal of multiple ranges and multiple domains (disjuntion >interpretation) you can say. > ><rdf:Property rdf:about="&p3p;disputeResolution"> > <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">dispute resolution</rdfs:label> > <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en"> > A collection of dispute resolution procedures that may be > followed for disputes about a service's privacy practices. > </rdfs:comment> > <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&p3p;Policy"/> > <rdfs:range >rdf:resource="&p3p;DisputeResolution-independent-organization"/> > <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&p3p;DisputeResolution-court"/> > <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&p3p;DisputeResolution-applicable-law"/> > <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&p3p;DisputeResolution-customer-service"/> ></rdf:Property> > > And you have exactly what you wanted. And if, given your approach, I wrote: <p3p:Policy> <p3p:disputeResolution rdf:resource="&bwm;Gotcha"/> </p2p:Policy> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&p3p;disputeResolution"> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&bwm;Gotcha"/> </rdf:Property> Brian
Received on Monday, 4 February 2002 10:35:09 UTC