Re: p3p rdf schema

  With the proposal of multiple ranges and multiple domains (disjuntion
interpretation) you can say. 
                
<rdf:Property rdf:about="&p3p;disputeResolution">
  <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">dispute resolution</rdfs:label>
  <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">
    A collection of dispute resolution procedures that may be
    followed for disputes about a service&apos;s privacy practices.
  </rdfs:comment>
  <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&p3p;Policy"/>
  <rdfs:range 
rdf:resource="&p3p;DisputeResolution-independent-organization"/>
  <rdfs:range  rdf:resource="&p3p;DisputeResolution-court"/>
  <rdfs:range  rdf:resource="&p3p;DisputeResolution-applicable-law"/>
  <rdfs:range  rdf:resource="&p3p;DisputeResolution-customer-service"/>
</rdf:Property>

  And you have exactly what you wanted.
  
  Regards,
          Marc
          
  PS: Sorry for going back always to the same subject, but I think the
decision RDFS wants to take is not the correct one and p3p example is
perfect to show it.

Brian McBride writes:

> Hi Marc,
> 
> At 14:10 04/02/2002 +0000, tarod@softhome.net wrote:
> 
> >   Thank you for your attention again, Brian.
> >
> ><!DOCTYPE rdf:RDF [
> >   <!ENTITY rdf     "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
> >   <!ENTITY p3p     "http://www.w3.org/2002/01/p3prdfv1#">
> >]>
> ><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="&rdf;"
> >          xmlns:p3p ="&p3p;">
> >   <p3p:Policy rdf:about="X">
> >         <p3p:disputeResolution rdf:resource="Y"/>
> >   </p3p:Policy>
> >   <p3p:DisputeResolution rdf:about="Y"/>
> ></rdf:RDF>
> >
> >   Is it correct?
> 
> I thought that might be the sort of thing you had in mind.  I don't know of 
> any way in RDF schema to stop you doing this.  It doesn't have a way of 
> saying "and this is all there is".
> 
> Brian
>

Received on Monday, 4 February 2002 10:23:20 UTC