- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 15:01:00 +0000
- To: tarod@softhome.net
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Hi Marc, At 14:10 04/02/2002 +0000, tarod@softhome.net wrote: > Thank you for your attention again, Brian. > ><!DOCTYPE rdf:RDF [ > <!ENTITY rdf "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"> > <!ENTITY p3p "http://www.w3.org/2002/01/p3prdfv1#"> >]> ><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="&rdf;" > xmlns:p3p ="&p3p;"> > <p3p:Policy rdf:about="X"> > <p3p:disputeResolution rdf:resource="Y"/> > </p3p:Policy> > <p3p:DisputeResolution rdf:about="Y"/> ></rdf:RDF> > > Is it correct? I thought that might be the sort of thing you had in mind. I don't know of any way in RDF schema to stop you doing this. It doesn't have a way of saying "and this is all there is". Brian
Received on Monday, 4 February 2002 10:02:35 UTC