- From: Andy Powell <a.powell@ukoln.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 20:25:02 +0100 (BST)
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Brian McBride wrote: > Andy, > > I hope this has gone to the right email address. Yes. Thanks for the chance to comment. The internet draft looks good to me. One minor comment... I presume that RDFS documents will also be assigned the application/rdf+xml MIME type, i.e. there is no plan to also register application/rdfs+xml? This is fine, I just wondered if it should be made explicit in the internet draft? Andy. > In > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2000AprJun/0047.html > > you raised an issue which was captured in > > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#mime-types-for-rdf-docs > > as > > [[[ > Summary: Concern that the RDFS CR offers no guidance about the mime type to > be assigned to RDF Schema documents, or to RDF/XML files in general. > > ]]] > > As recorded in > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Apr/0056.html > > the RDFCore WG approved submission of an internet draft > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-swartz-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype-00 > > > to begin the process of registering an RDF mime type. The WG will maintain > an action on its action list to ensure the process is completed and has > decided to close this issue. > > Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org > indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue. > > Brian McBride > RDFCore co-chair > > Andy -- Distributed Systems, UKOLN, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/a.powell +44 1225 383933 Resource Discovery Network http://www.rdn.ac.uk/
Received on Monday, 8 April 2002 15:28:50 UTC