W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ql@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: ugly-printed use cases output

From: Michael Brundage <xquery@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 17:38:37 -0700
To: Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com>, Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect.com>, "www-ql@w3.org 2" <www-ql@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BBBC711D.3FD%xquery@comcast.net>

Hi Howard,

I wrote a little perl script that extracts most of queries and output
directly from the Use Cases document itself.  If I recall correctly, there
were places where the document structure is inconsistent, so you have to do
a little fixup afterwards.  If you're interested, let me know and I'll dig
it out and send it to you.


On 10/22/03 5:35 PM, "Howard Katz" <howardk@fatdog.com> wrote:
> Nobody else thinks a normative version of this might be a good thing to
> have? I stand forelornly alone?
> Howard
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@datadirect.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 3:08 PM
>> To: Howard Katz; www-ql@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: ugly-printed use cases output
>> At 05:16 PM 10/22/2003, Howard Katz wrote:
>>> Is there a full version of the Use Cases output available somewhere that
>>> isn't pretty-printed? I'd find it useful for checking compliance against
>>> whitespace-handling requirements. Pretty printing is nice to look at but
>>> makes it harder to see if I'm doing whitespace properly. Does
>> such a beast
>>> exist?
>> Nope! Sorry....
>> Jonathan
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2003 20:38:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:43 UTC