- From: Michael Brundage <xquery@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 17:38:37 -0700
- To: Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com>, Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@datadirect.com>, "www-ql@w3.org 2" <www-ql@w3.org>
Hi Howard, I wrote a little perl script that extracts most of queries and output directly from the Use Cases document itself. If I recall correctly, there were places where the document structure is inconsistent, so you have to do a little fixup afterwards. If you're interested, let me know and I'll dig it out and send it to you. Yours, michael On 10/22/03 5:35 PM, "Howard Katz" <howardk@fatdog.com> wrote: > Nobody else thinks a normative version of this might be a good thing to > have? I stand forelornly alone? > Howard > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@datadirect.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 3:08 PM >> To: Howard Katz; www-ql@w3.org >> Subject: Re: ugly-printed use cases output >> >> >> At 05:16 PM 10/22/2003, Howard Katz wrote: >> >>> Is there a full version of the Use Cases output available somewhere that >>> isn't pretty-printed? I'd find it useful for checking compliance against >>> whitespace-handling requirements. Pretty printing is nice to look at but >>> makes it harder to see if I'm doing whitespace properly. Does >> such a beast >>> exist? >> >> Nope! Sorry.... >> >> Jonathan >> >
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2003 20:38:36 UTC